If you look at the Lux thread, and at some of the video tutorials/demos on the Groboto site, they give plenty of demonstrations of the meshed results produced by. At first glance, GroBoto looks like it might be just another 3-D with the instructions and sample tutorial projects from the GroMobile site.
|Published (Last):||4 March 2010|
|PDF File Size:||20.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.83 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Will have a play around today I believe their underlying engine is a hybrid with both poly and CSG aspects. Why should they have all the fun?
Generative Bots | Syntopia
However they also offer a procedural engine capable of complex iteration and variation of objects to build more complex objects, and that’s where things can get really fun — their procedural engine kind of reminds me of “fusionThing”, if you’re familiar with that C4D plugin.
No registered tutoria, viewing this page. I believe they’re still working on improving the adaptive meshing to reduce overhead with exported models. I find the results quite acceptable. There’s been a really interesting thread over at the Luxology forums about Grobotoan interesting 3D package. The geometry is really good but quite heavy when meshed for export.
Groboto By jwiedeAugust 13, in The Lounge. This topic is now closed to further replies. Agreed, the results can be a bit heavy, but I don’t see them tutoriwl significantly worse than handing around frozen sub-d surfaces.
Sign In Sign Up. Hehe, just like Beetlejuice, say Groboto enough times grbooto Darrel shows up I find the overall modeling workflow similar to “kit bashing”, if you’re familiar with the term.
Looks great, thanks for the heads up. How good is the geometry creation with booleans?
They’re clearly focusing significant effort on the quality of geometry produced for export, and it shows. I saw an older thread, but it was about an older version and didn’t say much. Lately, I’m more concerned ggoboto edge flows for animation, and so far I’ve been pretty satisfied with Groboto’s mesh results. On the surface, similar to the CSG approach of building up objects using parametric primitives, then combining them using booleans, to get the basic shapes wanted.
I’m more than willing to pay it in order to have access to Groboto’s tools. There’s been a really interesting thread over at the Luxology forums about Grobotoan interesting 3D package Thanks for the links.
By jwiedeAugust 13, in The Lounge. Of course I’m happy to answer any questions, and very interested in seeing any hybrid works you guys produce.
GroBoto v3 Tutorial Resources
I won’t be selling my Bonzai3D license just yet, but I find modeling in Groboto surprisingly productive, albeit a bit “different” UI environment. The Luxology thread about Groboo is hereand one of the package’s developers is even active in it providing tips and tricks, and how to migrate between Groboto and Modo.
Keep in mind, the exported results from CSG packages can be heavy as well. Thanks for the link John, I did not hear about it grbooto now.
tutorlal Groboto’s evolved quite a bit in V3, and thus far I’ve been very happy with the improvements and changes made. It looks interesting so I’ll check it out.
Posted November 5, I had never heard of this app before either, but it looks intriguing enough that I downloaded the trial version. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites.